via GIPHY
Different sources list different titles as the first to be released on DVD. A Google search listed TWISTER in 1997 as the first commercial release, yet on this site the first releases are listed as on December 20, 1996: POINT OF NO RETURN, BLADE RUNNER, ERASER, and THE FUGITIVE. Over the years, we have seen the format grow to include our favorite films, heard controversies by critics on review sites like www.dvdbeaver.com, seen it grow into formats such as Blu-Ray and HD-DVD, and now, of course, seen it start to dwindle and fade away as streaming becomes more mainstream.
People were instantly attracted to the number of special features that were once limited to laserdiscs, its compact nature which made it much cheaper than laserdisc, the clarity of image and sound compared to VHS, and as time went on these other formats were left behind. And yet, as hard as it is to believe, not everyone got on board the DVD Popularity Train when the format started making its way into stores and eventually consumer living rooms. Here were some early arguments people had with the format.
via GIPHY
1) "I DON'T WANT TO SEE BLACK!"
The plus side to DVD was that it was beginning to standardize presenting films in their intended aspect ratios as they would have been seen in theaters. Few people owned a 16x9 television set when DVD came out, so most would see these films in their letterbox formats on their square 4x3 tv sets. While today, a 2.35:1 aspect ratio film presents a thin black line on the top and bottom of a16x9 TV, when DVD first came out, two thirds of the screen (above and below the image of the film) would be black. While it is nice that DVD allowed for the entire film frame to be seen, on the average TV at the time the image would now appear quite small. Also, many people still hadn't grasped the concept of seeing a rectangle in a movie theater vs. a square when they were in their homes and thought that there was more magical image above the frame line that didn't exist. They didn't understand that the image was getting cropped to the left and right of what would fit on their TV.
Of course, if you read this blog's PORKY'S article, you would have learned about the open matte 1.85 films, which did have a 4x3 image that was now being matted for DVD. Here's another example-- the fullscreen vs. widescreen versions of GUESS WHO'S COMING TO DINNER, available on Sony Home Entertainment:
Years later, people are still arguing about how their DVDs for CARRIE and PORKY'S are censored because their is less nudity than on their old VHS tapes, not understanding that the nudity was always cropped from the widescreen image. Thankfully, by the turn of the century, 16x9 TVs were becoming more commonplace, people were understanding how aspect ratios worked, and things calmed down.
2) "I CAN'T TELL THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THIS AND VHS"
via GIPHY
I get it, the first reaction I would have too is "Are you vision impaired?", but believe it or not, this was a legitimate argument for many consumers at that time. The average TV still operated with tube technology-- the image it produced was soft, yet bright, so that whether you were watching network TV, HBO, a laserdisc, or a VHS tape, the image was similar. Of course, with a VHS recorded in SLP mode or that was a dub of another tape, one would see anomalies, but if one was looking at a consumer VHS vs. a consumer DVD on the average 1990s TV, the difference in quality was only slightly different due to the technological limitations of the TV....and most certainly not worth repurchasing one's entire home video collection. A good sounding Hi-Fi track could suit the needs of the small speaker on a 1990s TV the same way that a DVD could. In fact, because the VHS tapes were mixed specifically for those TVs and DVDs tended to be mixed more for 5.1 surround systems, chances are the average consumer would have a better audio experience with the VHS than the DVD.
3) "TOO FRAGILE"
VHS was an incredibly durable format-- beyond the Hi-Fi track going, which we discussed earlier. If there was a section that was damaged by a machine, there would be a few seconds of bad video (still viewable in most cases), and the tape would chug through and get a better signal. Usually, it does not take more than a minute for VHS to clear itself from audiovisual issues, which tend to be no more than some green and white dropout lines scrolling over the screen and the audio fading in and out.
via GIPHY
Hence, people were a little rougher with VHS tapes. They didn't need to obsess keeping them in their sleeves, worry about dropping them, etc. DVDs on the other hand were much more fragile due to not just the technology, but the size. A smudge of a fingerprint could make a DVD freeze. A 1/2" scratch, if it is deep enough, could ruin an entire 20 minutes of program for the viewer permanently. And one couldn't simply sit through and still make out what was going on during this bad portion like they could with VHS dropout lines. Now, the entire disc would stop working and the consumer had to hope that turning the machine off and on again would resolve the problem, which would then result in them needing to start the program over and skip to where the problem existed and hopefully to where it resolved itself...which leads into our next problem people had with the format.
4) "I CAN'T START WHERE I LEFT OFF"
via GIPHY
Today, most DVD players can resume where one leaves off on a disc when they turn their players back on after powering it off, but this was a feature that was only on more expensive DVD players when the format was first introduced. This means that if someone watched half of a movie and wanted to return to it at a later time, they would have to find where this moment was, either by skipping through the chapters in the film or by using the menus, which were hard to navigate. This leads us to our last complaint.......
5) "HOW DO I WORK THIS DARN THING?"
via GIPHY
Today, we live in an age where technology is much more a part of our lives than it was back in 1997. At that time, only 36% of Americans had a computer in their home according to the US Census. VHS tapes were pretty self-explanatory in how they worked. By putting a commercial tape in a machine, it would start automatically. There were a handful of buttons one needed to operate a commercial tape-- Play, Fast Forward, Rewind, Stop, Pause, and Eject. Then came DVD with its FBI warnings that one couldn't skip, its menus that required a little bit of a technological background to get around, and the many different features of a disc (sound, subtitles, different versions) that required navigation-- all a bit much for a population that hadn't necessarily all been exposed to a home computer on a regular basis. For people who didn't want to "see black" and wanted to watch the film full screen (a 1.33 aspect ratio for 4x3 TVs), many times two sided discs were available, one with the full screen version, one with the widescreen. Whether side A or B had a specific version was never standardized, meaning the customer was obligated to squint and look at the tiny writing on the disc to determine which side they wanted to see. This being said, if a film was longer, in the early days of DVD both sides of a disc were used to fit the entire program on it (i.e. ROBIN HOOD PRINCE OF THIEVES).
via GIPHY
It may seem puzzling for people today that there was a time when people thumbed their noses at the DVD format. After it took off it very quickly wiped out the VHS market and forced studios to go through a restoration and remastering process of their libraries to get the films ready for the new format. It standardized how the consumer watched movies until Bluray and streaming began taking over. As the days of DVDs wane and we begin to look at this format nostalgically, let us not forget to tip our hats to those who noticed the flaws and suffered through the early days...and hope that they have now embraced DVD as we all have.